IPG Insights - Never Ignore the Numbers When it Comes to Energy Performance

Energy performance has become central to the commercial viability of development. Yet in the rush to meet policy targets and investor expectations, key terms such as Energy Strategy and Energy Statement are often blurred. Understanding the difference matters. Each plays a distinct role in ensuring developments not only meet planning policy but also deliver long-term value.

Setting the Direction

An Energy Strategy is a conceptual roadmap developed at the earliest stages of a project. It is typically prepared by a sustainability or energy consultant to guide how a scheme will improve efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. The strategy considers a range of approaches, from passive design and renewable energy generation to heat networks and demand management.

Crucially, an Energy Strategy aligns commercial ambition with local and regional frameworks such as Local Area Energy Plans or Heat Network Priority Areas. By considering these frameworks early, developers can anticipate policy shifts, strengthen planning applications and adapt procurement or funding models before designs are fixed. This strategic view creates flexibility, helping teams navigate both market change and regulatory evolution.

Supporting Planning

Where the Energy Strategy sets the direction, the Energy Statement formalises it. Usually required for planning submissions, it translates conceptual aims into measurable outputs through energy modelling, emissions data and compliance checks. The statement demonstrates how a project meets relevant local planning policies and technical standards.

Energy Statements tend to follow established regulatory templates, showing how a design aligns with local guidance. Yet the route to compliance is rarely singular. Understanding the intent behind policy - rather than treating it as a checklist, allows developers to propose innovative, lower-carbon solutions that still satisfy planning requirements.

Why the Distinction Matters?

While an Energy Statement focuses on planning compliance, an Energy Strategy takes a broader, more dynamic view. It considers risk, funding, delivery partners and long-term operational outcomes. Developers who rely only on an Energy Statement risk costly redesigns if policies change or technical constraints emerge later.

An effective Energy Strategy gives room to manoeuvre. It allows developers to explore alternative routes that meet or exceed policy goals, while balancing commercial realities. This flexibility often unlocks better financial and environmental performance, ensuring developments are resilient to future regulation and market expectations.

A Changing Environment

The regulatory landscape is shifting fast. The Future Homes Standard, EPC reform and the Net Zero Carbon Building Standard all point towards a more demanding baseline for energy performance. Developers must also factor in practical constraints, particularly grid connection. In some parts of the UK, capacity is already limited, with delays stretching to the end of the decade. Early engagement with Distribution Network Operators can prevent costly bottlenecks and protect project viability.

Future-Proofing Development

Energy planning that ignores regulatory and technical change risks obsolescence before a project even breaks ground. Future proofing means anticipating evolving demand from electric vehicle infrastructure to heat networks and ensuring developments can adapt without expensive retrofits.

Early, strategic energy planning is no longer optional. It is the foundation of commercially sound, low-carbon development that stands the test of time.

‍